Mismatched Length Scales
One Size Does Not Fit All
Engineers who take the “one size fits all” approach to thermal simulation may run the risk of missing hazards that are due to fine-grain temperature variations.
Different Applications, Different Scales
Microelectronics thermal performance is typically modeled at the millimeter scale of package and PCB features, which can amply predict the average chip temperature. Many chip designers assume that they are getting adequate thermal management using simulators that were built for package / PCB.
However, the submicron power sources and heat conduction paths within the modern chip can produce fine-grain temperature variations (ΔT), which can lead to IC reliability and performance issues. These issues may not be visible even using IR imaging or thermal simulation with 10µm resolution.
It is simply not practical for a single simulator to span the wide range of length scales -- from the millimeter scale of package and PCB, to the submicron scale of IC layout features. To bridge the two different physical length scales, you can use a package simulator to model the region outside the die (package and PCB) and produce the boundary conditions as seen at the die faces, and use an IC simulator to model the region inside the die.
Automation, Capacity, Resolution
| Ansys Icepak | Mentor FloTHERM | Apache Sentinel-TI | Cadence Encounter Power System | Synopsys Sentaurus | Gradient HeatWave |
|
| Package-Thermal Simulation |
Coarse | Coarse | Coarse | |||
| IC Full-Chip Capacity |
Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Device-Level Resolution |
Fine | Fine | Fine | |||
| Device-Level CAD Data Exchange | Manual | Manual | Layout, Power, Temperature |
Risk Assesment
- Does your chip have high performance transistors with high power densities and submicron features?
- Can your thermal simulator resolve temperature spikes at your transistor feature sizes?
- Can you model all the detailed layouts of your full chip, with distinct thermal properties for all the materials?